<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Huntsville City - EdTribune AL - Alabama Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Huntsville City. Data-driven education journalism for Alabama. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://al.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Montgomery County Cut Chronic Absence in 2024-25 but Remained Above 25%</title><link>https://al.edtribune.com/al/2026-09-14-al-montgomery-stalled-crisis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://al.edtribune.com/al/2026-09-14-al-montgomery-stalled-crisis/</guid><description>Correction: An earlier draft described the observed reporting span as the last four school years. This version names the years and treats 2024-25 as the most recent published data.</description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Correction: An earlier draft described the observed reporting span as the last four school years. This version names the years and treats 2024-25 as the most recent published data.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Montgomery County&apos;s chronic absenteeism rate fell 3.25 percentage points in 2024-25. Its 25.29% rate remained the highest among Alabama districts enrolling more than 10,000 students, and it has been above 25% in each of the four reporting years from 2021-22 through 2024-25.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The district&apos;s rate stood at 25.29% in 2024-25, more than double the statewide 12.05%. That is down from 28.54% the year before, an improvement of 3.25 percentage points that slightly outpaced the state&apos;s 2.79-point improvement over the same year. Across those four reporting years, the endpoint changed by 0.53 points, while the annual rates varied: 25.82% in 2021-22, 26.33% in 2022-23, 28.54% in 2023-24, and 25.29% in 2024-25, a net change of about half a percentage point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Elsewhere the change has been much larger. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/mobile&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Mobile County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; went from 30.93% to 12.81%, a drop of 18.1 points. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/birmingham&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Birmingham City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; fell 15.9 points, to 13.16%. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/huntsville&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Huntsville City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is now at 8.23%, below the 11.41% it recorded in 2018-19.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The widening gap&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before the pandemic, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/montgomery&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Montgomery County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s attendance figures were close to the statewide picture. Its 2018-19 rate of 11.95% sat 0.78 points above the state&apos;s 11.17%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/img/2026-09-14-al-montgomery-stalled-crisis-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Montgomery County chronic absenteeism trend vs state average, showing the divergence after the pandemic&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Chronic absenteeism rose sharply across Alabama in 2021-22. Montgomery&apos;s rate reached 25.82%, but so did Mobile&apos;s (30.93%) and Birmingham&apos;s (29.09%). The difference is what came next.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gap between Montgomery and the state has widened from 0.78 points in 2018-19 to 13.24 points in 2024-25. Montgomery&apos;s rate is now more than twice the statewide figure, a disparity that did not exist before the pandemic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This comparison begins in 2018-19. Alabama does not publish a 2019-20 figure in the data used here, and the panel resumes with 2020-21.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Among large districts&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fourteen Alabama districts enrolled more than 10,000 students in 2024-25. Montgomery has the highest chronic absenteeism rate of the fourteen, at 25.29%, more than 8 points clear of the next highest, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/jefferson&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Jefferson County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; at 16.97%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/img/2026-09-14-al-montgomery-stalled-crisis-comparison.png&quot; alt=&quot;Large district chronic absenteeism comparison showing Montgomery as the highest, with 2021-22 rates for reference&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Montgomery is also furthest from its own pre-pandemic level. It sits 13.34 points above its 2018-19 rate. The next largest such gap belongs to Jefferson County, at 6.50 points, and nine of the fourteen remain above where they were in 2018-19.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nine of the fourteen large districts remained above their own 2018-19 rates in 2024-25, so recovery was uneven across the comparison group.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those comparisons start from very different places. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/shelby&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Shelby County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s 0.54-point decline began at 11.59%, near the state average at the time. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/madison-045&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Madison County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; rose from 9.70% to 14.35%, which is still nearly 11 points below Montgomery&apos;s level. Montgomery began the span at 25.82%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Inside the numbers&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Within Montgomery, chronic absenteeism varies widely from one student group to another.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/img/2026-09-14-al-montgomery-stalled-crisis-subgroups.png&quot; alt=&quot;Montgomery County chronic absenteeism by subgroup, most well above the state average&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Students who are economically disadvantaged and students who receive special education services share the highest rate, both at 29.0%. Black students are at 28.2%. Nine of the ten student groups the state reports separately for Montgomery sit above the statewide all-student rate of 12.05%, including white students at 13.1% and English learners at 17.4%. The exception is Asian students, at 3.5%, who are below both the state&apos;s all-student rate and the state&apos;s rate for Asian students of 3.9%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The published rates are elevated across several student groups. These outcome data do not establish a cause.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Thirteen percentage points above pre-pandemic&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Montgomery County sits 13.34 percentage points above its 2018-19 rate of 11.95%. Statewide, the corresponding figure is 0.88 points.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state improved by 2.79 points from 2023-24 to 2024-25. Montgomery improved by 3.25 points during that interval, but its published rate remained 13.34 points above its 2018-19 level.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Chronic-absence rates come from the Alabama State Department of Education’s &lt;a href=&quot;https://reportcard.alsde.edu/&quot;&gt;Federal Report Card&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item><item><title>Mobile County Cut Chronic Absenteeism by More Than Half in Two Years</title><link>https://al.edtribune.com/al/2026-09-03-al-mobile-dramatic-recovery/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://al.edtribune.com/al/2026-09-03-al-mobile-dramatic-recovery/</guid><description>In 2022-23, nearly one in three Mobile County students was chronically absent. Two years later, in 2024-25, it was closer to one in eight.</description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In 2022-23, nearly one in three Mobile County students was chronically absent. Two years later, in 2024-25, it was closer to one in eight.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alabama&apos;s largest school system reduced its chronic absenteeism rate from 31.54% in 2022-23 to 12.81% in 2024-25, an improvement of 18.73 percentage points, cutting the rate by 59.4%. The two-year trajectory (31.54% to 17.91% to 12.81%) is the steepest sustained decline of any Alabama district enrolling more than 10,000 students.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mobile County&apos;s 2024-25 rate is not just approaching pre-COVID levels. It has dropped below them. The district&apos;s 2018-19 baseline was 14.44%. At 12.81%, Mobile sits 1.63 percentage points better than where it stood before the pandemic disrupted everything.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;From worst to near-average&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The scale of the turnaround becomes clearer in context. In 2022-23, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/mobile&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Mobile County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&apos;s chronic rate of 31.54% made it one of the worst-performing large districts in Alabama, higher than &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/birmingham&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Birmingham&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (23.35%), &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/montgomery&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Montgomery County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (26.33%), or &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/jefferson&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Jefferson County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (17.83%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/img/2026-09-03-al-mobile-dramatic-recovery-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Mobile County&apos;s chronic absenteeism trajectory showing the dramatic decline from 31.5% to 12.8%&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By 2024-25, Mobile sits at 12.81%, just 0.76 percentage points above the state average of 12.05%. A district that was once the attendance crisis of the state is now essentially average.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The improvement outpaces what other large districts achieved. Birmingham improved by 15.9 percentage points from its peak, impressive, but still less than Mobile&apos;s 18.7. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/huntsville&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Huntsville City&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; improved by 10.6 points. Montgomery, by contrast, improved by just 1.0 point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/img/2026-09-03-al-mobile-dramatic-recovery-comparison.png&quot; alt=&quot;Comparison of large district recovery from COVID peak showing Mobile County with the largest improvement&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Every subgroup improved&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What distinguishes Mobile&apos;s recovery is its breadth. Every major subgroup improved substantially from its 2022-23 level:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Economically disadvantaged students improved the most, dropping 20.5 percentage points (from 35.7% to 15.2%). Black students improved by 20.4 points (33.9% to 13.5%). White students improved by 17.4 points (30.4% to 13.1%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/img/2026-09-03-al-mobile-dramatic-recovery-subgroups.png&quot; alt=&quot;Mobile County subgroup recovery from 2022-23 to 2024-25, showing every group improved by at least 13 percentage points&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even English learners, who already had comparatively lower chronic rates, improved by 13.2 percentage points (19.6% to 6.39%). Hispanic students improved by 14.2 points.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of those five groups, economically disadvantaged and Black students had the highest 2022-23 rates and also posted the largest absolute improvements. Mobile&apos;s recovery did not simply ride on its more affluent students getting back to school. The most affected populations participated in the turnaround.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;What happened&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mobile&apos;s trajectory suggests something more deliberate than a natural regression to the mean. The district&apos;s rate was essentially flat from 2021-22 to 2022-23 (30.93% to 31.54%), and it was not gradually improving. Then it dropped 13.6 points in a single year, and another 5.1 the next.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That kind of sharp inflection point typically reflects a policy change, a leadership decision, or a systematic intervention rather than organic drift. Alabama&apos;s statewide strategies (the Helping Families Initiative, early warning systems, the shift from punitive truancy enforcement to school-based parent meetings) may have found particularly fertile ground in a large district with the infrastructure to implement them at scale.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The district&apos;s size works in its favor. With 47,366 students in 2024-25, Mobile County has the staff, data systems, and administrative capacity to identify chronically absent students early and deploy targeted interventions. Smaller districts in the Black Belt, facing similar or worse rates, often lack these resources.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The remaining gap&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At 12.81%, Mobile&apos;s chronic absenteeism is not solved: applied to the district&apos;s 47,366 students, that rate works out to roughly 6,100 children missing 18 or more days of school in 2024-25. And within the district, subgroup disparities persist. Economically disadvantaged students remain at 15.22%, more than twice the rate of English learners at 6.39%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the district has demonstrated something that the broader data only hints at: that a large, high-poverty, majority-Black school system can not only recover from the pandemic attendance crisis, but surpass where it was before. Mobile County&apos;s pre-COVID rate of 14.44% was itself unremarkable. Its 2024-25 rate of 12.81% is meaningfully better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Five of the 14 Alabama systems enrolling more than 10,000 students now sit below their 2018-19 chronic absenteeism rate. Mobile is the one that began the recovery with the highest rate of any of them and finished with the largest drop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>