<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Washington County - EdTribune AL - Alabama Education Data</title><description>Education data coverage for Washington County. Data-driven education journalism for Alabama. Every number verified against state DOE data.</description><link>https://al.edtribune.com/</link><language>en-us</language><copyright>EdTribune 2026</copyright><item><title>Alabama&apos;s Black Belt: Where Chronic Absenteeism Is Twice the State Average</title><link>https://al.edtribune.com/al/2026-07-08-al-black-belt-absence-crisis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://al.edtribune.com/al/2026-07-08-al-black-belt-absence-crisis/</guid><description>Across a crescent of rural counties stretching from southwestern Alabama to the state&apos;s eastern border, students miss school at nearly twice the rate of their peers statewide.</description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate><content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Across a crescent of rural counties stretching from southwestern Alabama to the state&apos;s eastern border, students miss school at nearly twice the rate of their peers statewide.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This analysis uses a 20-county Black Belt set. &lt;a href=&quot;https://encyclopediaofalabama.org/article/black-belt-region-in-alabama/&quot;&gt;Definitions of Alabama&apos;s Black Belt vary&lt;/a&gt;, but the region&apos;s name traces to its dark prairie soil and later to its majority-Black population in many counties. Those districts have a collective chronic absenteeism rate of 22.4% in 2024-25. The state average is 12.05%. Half of these districts have rates above 20%. Five exceed 30%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the geographic split beneath Alabama&apos;s attendance recovery: the statewide number is improving, but the Black Belt average remains far above both the state rate and the rest of Alabama&apos;s district average.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The spectrum of crisis&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Black Belt is not monolithic. Chronic absenteeism rates range from 7.65% in Marengo County, actually below the state average, to 48.54% in Barbour County, where nearly half of all students meet the chronic-absence threshold.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/img/2026-07-08-al-black-belt-absence-crisis-districts.png&quot; alt=&quot;Black Belt county chronic absenteeism rates in 2025 showing the range from below state average to nearly 50%&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Five districts have rates above 30%: &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/barbour&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Barbour County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (48.54%), &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/greene&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Greene County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (37.42%), &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/bullock&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Bullock County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (35.65%), &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/perry&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Perry County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (31.26%), and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/washington&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Washington County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (30.53%). Another five (Sumter, Escambia, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/macon&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Macon County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, Crenshaw, and Butler counties) sit between 20% and 28%.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At the other end, Marengo County (7.65%), Pickens County (10.19%), and Russell County (10.92%) are below the state average, a reminder that the regional pattern still contains real local variation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;A gap that won&apos;t close&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The gap between Black Belt districts and the rest of Alabama is not new, but the pandemic widened it, and the recovery has not narrowed it back.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/img/2026-07-08-al-black-belt-absence-crisis-trend.png&quot; alt=&quot;Trend showing Black Belt average chronic absenteeism persistently above the rest of Alabama&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before COVID, in 2018-19, Black Belt districts averaged a chronic rate of 13.2% compared to 11.0% for the rest of the state, a gap of about 2 percentage points. By 2024-25, the Black Belt average had risen to 22.4% while the rest of the state dropped to 11.4%, widening the gap to 11 percentage points.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rest of Alabama&apos;s districts nearly returned to their pre-COVID levels (11.4% vs. 11.0%). Black Belt districts are 9.2 percentage points above theirs. The pandemic did not create the Black Belt&apos;s attendance problems, but it exposed and deepened them in ways that the recovery has not addressed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Only three recovered&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Of the 20 Black Belt counties, only three have chronic absenteeism rates at or below their 2018-19 levels: Dallas County (down 6.5 percentage points to 17.3%), Marengo County (down 3.6 points to 7.65%), and Wilcox County (down 2.5 points to 15.0%).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/img/2026-07-08-al-black-belt-absence-crisis-recovery.png&quot; alt=&quot;Change from pre-COVID baseline for each Black Belt county showing 17 of 20 still above 2019 levels&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The other 17 remain above their pre-COVID baselines, many dramatically so. Greene County is 25.8 percentage points above its 2019 rate of 11.6%. Bullock County is 24.9 points above. Barbour County is 20.4 points above. These are not marginal increases: they represent a fundamental worsening of school attendance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The scale of deterioration in Greene, Bullock, and Macon counties is particularly striking because their pre-COVID rates were relatively modest in the available data: 11.6%, 10.8%, and 6.6%, respectively. That makes the increases look less like a continuation of a 2018-19 high-rate pattern and more like a post-pandemic break from those baselines.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;Structural context&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The absence data does not identify causes. The strongest public context is suggestive rather than direct: the &lt;a href=&quot;https://encyclopediaofalabama.org/article/black-belt-region-in-alabama/&quot;&gt;Encyclopedia of Alabama&lt;/a&gt; notes that nine of Alabama&apos;s 10 poorest counties are in the Black Belt and links population shifts to lagging economic growth, poverty, and limited employment. The University of Alabama Education Policy Center separately describes the region&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;https://sites.ua.edu/edpolicy/our-research/black-belt/&quot;&gt;transportation infrastructure deficit, healthcare access challenges, provider shortages, and persistent poverty&lt;/a&gt;. None of that proves why a student missed school in 2024-25, but it describes the conditions under which attendance work is being attempted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Direct evidence on state attendance infrastructure is narrower. &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtrust.org/chronic-absenteeism/alabama/&quot;&gt;EdTrust&apos;s Alabama attendance profile&lt;/a&gt; says the state uses PowerSchool and Schoology to track attendance patterns and alert staff to students at risk of chronic absence. A state evaluation of the &lt;a href=&quot;https://evidence.alabama.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Helping-Families-Initiative_Program-Evaluation_Final-Report_For-Web.pdf&quot;&gt;Helping Families Initiative&lt;/a&gt; says the program was designed to address chronic absenteeism and student behavior but was not operating as designed across circuits, limiting fidelity and possible effectiveness. That is a competing explanation for the gap between statewide intervention design and Black Belt outcomes: the tools may exist, but implementation capacity may differ from district to district.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2&gt;The three that recovered&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The three Black Belt districts that have recovered to at or below their 2018-19 rates are &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/dallas&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Dallas County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/marengo&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Marengo County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://edtribune.com/al/districts/wilcox&quot; class=&quot;district-link&quot;&gt;Wilcox County&lt;sup&gt;↗&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Dallas County dropped from 23.8% to 17.3%, still high in absolute terms. Marengo County&apos;s 7.65% rate is below the state average.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unresourced: Whether these recoveries reflect specific local interventions, data artifacts, demographic changes, or something else is not clear from the absence data alone. They are the exceptions that keep the regional average from being even higher, not evidence that the broader Black Belt pattern has resolved.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seventeen counties have not found that path yet. The longer rates stay above 20% and 30%, the more students those districts must re-engage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Detailed code that reproduces the analysis and figures in this article is available exclusively to EdTribune subscribers.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</content:encoded></item></channel></rss>